Connect with us

Politics

Constitution Doesn’t Require Presidential Candidate To Score 25% Of FCT – Osunbor Makes Big Revelation

Published

on

A Professor of Law Senator Oserheimen Osunbor has said there is no section in Nigeria’s Constitution that requires a presidential candidate to score 25 percent of the Federal Capital Territory FCT.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Many Nigerians had interpreted the relevant section of the constitution, which has portrayed different meanings that a presidential candidate must win the FCT.

But the professor of law and a two-term Senator in a statement on Friday which he personally signed declared that there is no controversy as “the Constitution does not require a win in any particular place, the FCT inclusive.

The former Edo Governor said:””There is no section in our constitution that requires a presidential candidate to score “25% of the FCT”.Some people are simply reading into the constitution what is not there .

“What the constitution states clearly in section 133 is that to be declared winner the candidate must score at least 25% in “two-thirds of the 36 States of the Federation and the capital Territory” .

“It did not say 25% in the FCT which is how the legal draftsman would have rendered it if that was the intention.

He explained that:” In fact, the Constitution does not require a win in any particular place, the FCT inclusive.

“Ask any secondary school student who knows English comprehension the question, ” Where does section 133 of the Constitution require a candidate to score 25%.

“The only correct answer would be in two- third of the States of the Federation and the FCT.

“I have read and listened to some lawyers dwell on the rule of interpretation of statutes and the use of word “and”.

“The first rule of interpretation is that where the language of the statute is clear (as in this case) you do not need to belabor the issue of interpretation. 25% of two-thirds of the States and the FCT is clear enough. You do not need to go on a voyage of discovery to find what is not missing.

He maintained that “the language of the section is simple and straightforward.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *