Time To Restore Honour’ – Banire Speaks On Decline In Legal Profession

As earlier highlighted, beyond the challenges facing the judiciary and the legal profession in delivering justice, serious concerns also exist within the internal administration of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA).

These issues should not be dismissed as minor, as the strength of the Bar is directly linked to the effectiveness of the justice system. When the Bar weakens, the entire system of justice is affected. Since 1992, the association has struggled with recurring crises, declining unity, and reduced influence.

Over the years, NBA elections have increasingly been characterised by disputes, controversies, and prolonged legal battles. What should be a smooth and dignified leadership transition has instead turned into a highly contentious process. Even as another election cycle approaches, multiple court cases are already pending, raising concerns about the credibility of the process.

This situation raises a fundamental question: what exactly makes leadership positions within the Bar so fiercely contested? Ideally, such roles should be driven by a commitment to service. However, the intensity and hostility surrounding these contests suggest that other motivations—such as personal gain, influence, and relevance—may be at play.

Historically, the Bar was regarded as a noble institution grounded in ethics, professionalism, and public service. Today, however, its operations increasingly resemble partisan politics. Campaign strategies, alliances, lobbying, and even propaganda have become commonplace. A new class of “Bar politicians” has emerged—individuals who thrive more on internal politics than on legal practice—raising concerns about competence and governance within the association.

The cost of contesting elections within the Bar has also risen significantly, making it difficult for capable but less wealthy candidates to participate. Campaigns now require substantial financial resources for logistics, branding, and mobilisation. This growing monetisation not only excludes deserving candidates but also creates expectations of personal returns once elected, thereby undermining ethical standards.

Equally troubling is the growing culture among some members, particularly younger lawyers, who now demand financial or material benefits in exchange for support. What was once subtle lobbying has evolved into open transactional politics, including sponsorship of fees, accommodation, and other expenses. This trend risks fostering dependency and eroding the values of merit and integrity within the profession.

The long-term consequences are significant. Leaders who emerge from such a system often feel indebted to their sponsors, which can compromise their independence and decision-making. This weakens the Bar’s ability to act as a fearless watchdog and moral authority in society. Instead of addressing critical national issues, the association sometimes focuses on less impactful matters, raising questions about its priorities.

Furthermore, the Bar’s increasing reliance on government patronage for funding its activities threatens its autonomy. When an institution meant to hold the government accountable becomes dependent on it, its ability to function effectively is severely undermined.

This decline did not occur suddenly but is the result of years of gradual compromise, unchecked misconduct, and lack of decisive reforms. Addressing these challenges requires both structural and cultural changes. Electoral processes must be reformed, spending limits enforced, and inducements penalised. Technology should also be leveraged to improve transparency.

More importantly, there must be a shift in mindset. Members should prioritise candidates’ ideas, values, and competence over material incentives. Leadership within the Bar must once again be seen as a call to service rather than an opportunity for personal gain.

Ultimately, the legal profession must decide whether to restore its integrity or continue on a path of decline. The Bar cannot afford to mirror the worst aspects of the political system it is meant to regulate. Restoring its dignity will require courage, accountability, and a renewed commitment to ethical principles.