Hunger Protest Controversy: APC Defends Tinubu’s Adherence To 1999 Constitution

Hunger Protest Controversy: APC Defends Tinubu’s Adherence To 1999 Constitution

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has urged the organizers of the upcoming August 1 nationwide protest to reconsider their demand for President Bola Tinubu to abolish the 1999 Constitution. The party labeled this demand as unrealistic following a meeting with APC State Chairmen at their national headquarters in Abuja……… CONTINUE READING

The debate over amending or replacing the Nigerian Constitution has intensified in recent years, with various prominent figures advocating for change. On March 18, reports highlighted support from figures like Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and former Commonwealth Secretary-General Chief Emeka Anyaoku for abandoning the 1999 Constitution due to perceived legitimacy issues.

APC National Secretary Senator Ajibola Basiru responded by asserting that such demands are impractical. According to Basiru, the President alone cannot unilaterally discard the 1999 Constitution. Constitutional amendments require a complex process involving four-fifths of the National Assembly and two-thirds of State Assemblies, far beyond the scope of presidential authority.

Basiru criticized the demand to abolish the Senate, suggesting that it contradicts the call for amending rather than discarding the Constitution. He noted that constitutional amendments, including those involving the Senate and the House of Representatives, are already in progress through the National Assembly. He emphasized that legitimate avenues for change exist and should be pursued through proper legislative processes.

The APC also expressed concern about the protest’s revolutionary tone, warning against potential violence. Basiru urged Nigerians to be cautious, highlighting that the government will not tolerate disruptions or violence against citizens.

In summary, the APC defended the current constitutional framework and urged protesters to seek change through established legal channels rather than through disruptive demonstrations.