Supreme Court Rules Nigerian Government’s Actions Against Nnamdi Kanu Constitutes Terrorism, Says IPOB

Published

Supreme Court Rules Nigerian Government’s Actions Against Nnamdi Kanu Constitutes Terrorism, Says IPOB

IPOB has accused the Presidency and the Federal Government of engaging in acts of terrorism against its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, by deliberately withholding the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the Supreme Court’s December judgment. The group contends that this action violates Section 2 (3)(f) of the Terrorism Act, making the government, the presidency, and the Supreme Court justices, in essence, terrorists under Nigerian law.

According to Emma Powerful, the spokesperson for IPOB, the failure to release the CTC confirms Nigeria’s unwillingness to adhere to its treaty obligations. Citing Section 2 (3)(f) of the Terrorism (Prevention & Prohibition) Act, 2022, Powerful argues that the intentional disregard of extradition treaties and the extraordinary rendition of Nnamdi Kanu by the federal government constitute acts of terrorism. In essence, the Supreme Court justices are portrayed as a special terror squad utilized by the government to endorse national terrorism.

For more information join our WhatsApp group by clicking the link here: WhatsApp Group Invite

For contributions and inquiries only, contact us at omoikirodahoshiobugie@gmail.com, 08075806790 (WhatsApp only) Explore a diverse array of paid articles covering content related to shows, asylum letters, concerts, politics, and paid advertising

Author:
James Smith

Comments

0 comments

    Join the discussion

    Use a display name or leave it blank to comment as Anonymous. Email is not required.