Court Hits SERAP With ₦100 Million Fine In DSS Defamation Case

The ruling, delivered on Tuesday by Justice Yusuf Halilu, followed a case filed by the officers, Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele, who alleged that the organisation harmed their reputation through online publications.

In addition to the damages, the court directed SERAP to issue public apologies to the officers. The apologies must be published in two national newspapers, broadcast on two television stations, and posted on the organisation’s website. The court also awarded ₦1 million as litigation costs and imposed a 10 percent annual interest on the judgment sum until it is fully paid.

The dispute originated from a ₦5.5 billion suit filed by the DSS operatives after SERAP alleged that unidentified security officials unlawfully entered its Abuja office in September 2024 and intimidated its staff. These claims were made via the organisation’s website and social media platforms.

In its judgment, the court held that SERAP’s allegations were not backed by sufficient evidence and were inappropriate, particularly for an organisation known for promoting accountability. The judge ruled that the publication created a false impression about the officers and held SERAP liable for the reputational damage caused.

During the trial, the claimants argued that although their names were not explicitly mentioned, the details provided in the publication clearly identified them. Their counsel maintained that all elements required to establish defamation had been proven.

SERAP, however, urged the court to dismiss the case, arguing that its statements referred only to “DSS officials” without naming individuals, and that the claimants failed to prove the statements were specifically about them. The defence also contended that the DSS, as referenced, is not a legal entity capable of instituting a lawsuit, adding that it was undisputed that security personnel had visited the organisation’s office.

The officers explained that their visit on September 9, 2024, was a routine engagement intended to establish a working relationship with SERAP. They said they met a staff member who advised them to formally communicate with the organisation’s leadership.

They further stated that shortly after leaving, SERAP published claims suggesting that DSS operatives had unlawfully occupied its premises, including descriptions they said pointed directly to them.

According to the claimants, the публикации triggered widespread criticism from both local and international observers, including groups like Amnesty International and figures such as Femi Falana, which negatively affected their professional standing.

After reviewing all submissions, the court ruled in favour of the officers, granting damages, ordering public apologies, and awarding legal costs.