Judiciary Will Block It” — Amadi Reveals Why Fubara’s Impeachment Can’t Succeed

Speaking on Arise Television’s Morning Show on Friday, Amadi argued that the judicial stage of the impeachment procedure remains Fubara’s strongest defence and is likely to halt the process.

According to him, the impeachment effort largely depends on the constitution of an investigative panel by the state’s Chief Judge, which he described as the critical turning point in the entire process.

Amadi noted that Governor Fubara currently holds considerable influence on the judicial side, adding that the allegations raised by lawmakers fall short of constituting gross misconduct.

“The central pillar of impeachment is the appointment of investigators by the Chief Judge. That is the real anchor. Without it, the process collapses,” he said.

He explained that Fubara’s actions within the political context were strategic, stressing that the governor understands the political dynamics surrounding the impeachment attempt.

“He knows the game being played against him and has responded politically. More importantly, the grounds for impeachment are not legally compelling. Some would even describe them as flimsy,” Amadi stated.

He further explained that any investigative panel appointed would be constitutionally required to consist of individuals of integrity and neutrality, who would objectively assess whether the governor’s actions amount to gross misconduct.

“These investigators would examine the facts and ask a simple question: what exactly has the governor done since the end of the emergency rule that warrants impeachment?” he said.

Amadi added that if the panel concludes that the allegations are unproven, the impeachment process would automatically end, noting that the law allows only two outcomes—proven or not proven.

“The judicial process is the ultimate safeguard here. If the investigators return a verdict of ‘not proven,’ the impeachment is dead on arrival. That is where Governor Fubara’s greatest leverage lies,” he concluded.