War Of Words Erupts: Soludo’s Aide Demands Public Apology From Peter Obi Over Nnamdi Kanu Case

The Special Adviser on Media to the Anambra State Governor, Ejimofor Opara, has stated that the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, owes both the Nigerian judiciary and courts in Finland an apology over his remarks calling for the release of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Kanu is currently serving a life sentence following his conviction by a Federal High Court in Abuja in November 2025 on terrorism-related charges. He was found guilty on multiple counts, including incitement, membership of a proscribed organisation, and involvement in attacks linked to separatist activities in the South-East.

Peter Obi, during a discussion with Nigerians in Washington, had argued that Kanu should not be held in detention over statements allegedly made on Radio Biafra. He also stated that, if elected President, his administration would prioritise dialogue with aggrieved groups and separatist agitators rather than force.

However, in a statement released on Sunday, Opara condemned Obi’s comments, describing them as disrespectful to both the Nigerian judiciary and the courts in Finland, where Simon Ekpa—identified as Kanu’s associate—was previously tried, convicted, and sentenced to six years in prison for terrorism-related offences.

Opara described Obi’s remarks as careless, unfounded, and self-serving, accusing him of attempting to undermine judicial institutions.

He argued that Obi, having benefited from the Nigerian judiciary in the past, should instead demonstrate respect for the system.

According to the statement, “Peter Obi is a product of the Nigerian judiciary. In 2006, the courts restored his mandate under difficult circumstances. The same judiciary again intervened in 2007 after Andy Uba edged him out politically.

“If anyone should be an ambassador of the Nigerian judiciary, it should be Peter Gregory Obi.

“His comments on the conviction and sentencing of Nnamdi Kanu amount to an insult not only on the Nigerian judiciary but also on the Finnish courts, where Simon Ekpa—Kanu’s associate—was tried and sentenced for terrorism-related offences.

“For someone preparing for a major election, making statements that appear to sympathise with convicted terrorists is not helpful, especially when the judiciary has ensured a transparent and fair process.

“If Obi were more circumspect, he would understand that the judiciary even allowed live coverage of Kanu’s sentencing to prevent misinformation.

“Even if the courts choose to ignore his comments, history will remember those who sought to undermine institutions for personal ambition. Peter Obi owes both the Nigerian judiciary and the courts in Finland an open apology.”