Fayose Explains Why Local Government Autonomy Can’t Work

Fayose Explains Why Local Government Autonomy Can’t Work....KINDLY READ THE FULL STORY HERE▶

Former Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose has raised concerns about the recent Supreme Court ruling that grants local governments the right to receive monthly allocations directly from the federation account……… CONTINUE READING 

Fayose, a prominent member of the Peoples Democratic Party, emphasized that despite this judgment, state Houses of Assembly and governors will continue to hinder local government autonomy. He made these remarks during an appearance on Channels Television’s *Politics Today*.

He pointed out that no one can ascend to the position of local government chairman without the backing of a governor, asserting that the central authority will not allow local governments to operate independently. “You cannot separate the child from the mother,” he stated, highlighting the interconnectedness between local councils and state governance.

“I am not a lawyer, but as a politician and elder statesman, I believe no government should seize local government funds. However, let me be clear: you cannot take the child from the mother. No council chairman can exist without a governor’s support. Those who claim otherwise are wasting their time,” Fayose remarked.

He also noted that state Houses of Assembly oversee local government activities, reinforcing their control. During his tenure, Fayose recalled receiving funds from the federal government, managed by non-political figures rather than council chairmen.

Fayose further criticized local government officials for their lack of commitment, stating many employees often neglect their duties. He warned that any council chairman defying the governor would face backlash from the House of Assembly.

“On council meeting days, you’ll often find less than 10% of the staff present. They do not attend work regularly,” he said, challenging anyone to dispute his claims. He added that attempts to address this issue often lead to interference from local government unions, which threaten political repercussions.

According to Fayose, state governments generally perform more effectively than local ones, with many local officials primarily focused on collecting funds rather than fulfilling their responsibilities.